Count on Me|CORE

Use case · Group planning

Planning across dozens of entities, without the inbox as your filing system.

Pre-fill, send out, chase, collect, correct: this loop costs your team days every round. CORE takes it over – entity by entity. Anyone not yet moved across keeps sending their Excel package as before.

No big bang Excel keeps running alongside One valid version per entity

No sign-up · read-only · sample group with five entities

Group planning · Example Forecast II · FY 2028
5
Entities
3
Submitted
1
In review
1
Outstanding
Group AG planned in CORE
submitted 12 Mar 16:40
Sales South Ltd planned in CORE
submitted 13 Mar 09:05
Production East Ltd Excel package, imported
submitted 13 Mar 11:22
Services Ltd IC difference against Group AG
difference 14 Mar 08:17
Holdings North Ltd Excel package, not yet returned
outstanding

The loop

Six steps that repeat every single round.

Not one of them produces an insight. Together they absorb most of the time your department spends on planning.

01

Pre-filling

Master data and actuals are copied into each entity's package by hand. Every round from scratch, and again after every correction.

02

Sending out

The packages go out by email. From that moment there are as many versions of the truth as there are inboxes.

03

Collecting

Returns trickle in over days, at different revisions, some of them twice. Which one counts gets settled on the phone.

04

Correction loops

Every query restarts the cycle for that entity – file out, file in, compare revisions.

05

Bringing it together

The group picture is assembled by hand from the approved versions. A transposed figure here surfaces much, much later.

06

Reconciling IC

Who owes what to whom is settled between two controllers on a call. The outcome lives in no file anyone can look up afterwards.

The effort

Work it out once, with your own numbers.

The size of the problem comes down to three figures you already know. We are not supplying any of them.

Budget, forecast I, forecast II …

Everyone who receives a package.

Pre-filling, chasing, checking, consolidating.

240 person-days a year, on handling alone. That is the time spent before the first piece of analysis. The preset is a worked example, not a claim about your organisation – put your own figures in.

The move

Entity by entity. Never all at once.

At no point do you lose the ability to run a round. Whoever has moved across plans in CORE. Whoever has not sends their package as before – CORE reads it in and counts it.

1

Pilot with the awkward ones

Not the easiest entity first, but the ones carrying the special cases: a different financial year, their own chart of accounts, dense IC relationships. Whatever holds there holds everywhere afterwards.

2

Run both in parallel

Pilot entities plan in CORE, everyone else keeps sending their package. Both routes feed the same group accounts. The round runs through as if nothing had changed.

3

Follow at your own pace

Each further entity moves when it suits their calendar – between two rounds, never in the middle of one. There is no cut-over date on which everything has to work at once.

A round today

  1. Pre-fill packages and send them out
  2. Collect returns, compare revisions
  3. Correction loops per entity
  4. Reconcile IC on the phone
  5. Assemble the group picture by hand

A round running in parallel

  1. Open the round – it arrives pre-filled
  2. Those moved across plan directly, the rest send packages
  3. One valid version per entity, visible to everyone
  4. Differences sit in the round, not in a phone call
  5. The group picture stands as soon as the last version lands

IC reconciliation

The difference sits in the round, not in a phone call.

As long as two entities plan different figures, the relationship stays visibly open – with the amount, the counterparty and the timestamp. Nobody has to ring around to find out who booked what.

  • Every IC relationship with both sides side by side
  • A difference shown as an amount, not a question mark
  • Visible since when it has been open
  • Eliminated account by account once agreed, balance 0.00
Relationship Account Amount Status
Sales South → Group AG
IC receivable
20201 +2,380,000 ✔ agreed
Services Ltd → Group AG
Counterparty plans 1,900,000
20201 +2,140,000 ▲ 240,000 open
Production East → Sales South
IC revenue
80001 +840,000 ✔ agreed
Not yet agreed 240,000 1 relationship

For IT

Two questions your IT asks first.

More on data ownership, AI and connectivity on the home page under “For IT”.

“Do we have to unify our charts of accounts?”

No. A mapping per entity sits between your source system and the calculation model. Every entity keeps its own chart of accounts, and the model still adds up as one group.

  • Account mapping per entity
  • Existing charts of accounts stay as they are
  • Non-ERP entities via a dedicated screen

“Can every entity see the others' figures?”

Only where they should. A role and permission model decides who sees what – by entity, by area, by role. The group view stays with the people who need it.

  • Role-based access RBAC
  • Views by entity and by role
  • An immutable record of every change

Next step

Look at a round that is already running.

The sample group is ready, with no sign-up and nothing to install. Or let us show you in 30 minutes what the round looks like on your own structure.

or simply by email: kontakt@justexperts.de